Objectives: The desire to maintain a youthful and healthy appearance has led to the search for effective treatments in the field of aesthetics. Among the various options available, collagen stimulation treatment has gained popularity for its ability to deliver natural results and a comprehensive rejuvenating effect.

Introduction: Collagen stimulation treatment is based on the premise that the skin can regenerate and rejuvenate itself by activating its own natural processes. As we age, collagen production decreases, resulting in the appearance of wrinkles, loss of firmness, and uneven tone. This treatment addresses those problems on three distinct levels such as Epidermis, Dermis, Hypodermis and Periosteum.

Materials / method: The first level on which the treatment acts is the epidermis. Through a special medical chemical peel, is stimulatingthe production of collagen and elastin The second level of action is found in the dermis, the treatment such as biostimulator (biopeptides and PLLA) will be used to stimulate collagen production more intensely. The third level is the hypodermis at this level, HACa and PLLA substances can help sculpt the facial contour and improve jaw definition In addition to aesthetic improvement, periosteal repositioning with biostimulators offers functional benefits.

Results: Collagen stimulation treatment on the face represents an innovative solution for those seeking natural and effective rejuvenation. By acting on three distinct levels, from the epidermis to the hypodermis, a total revitalization effect is achieved that not only improves the external appearance, but also promotes long-term skin health.

Conclusion: As technology advances, these techniques are likely to continue to evolve, offering people the opportunity to feel and look better without compromising their natural essence. This comprehensive approach is not only a trend in aesthetics, but a true revolution in skin care.

Disclosures

Did you receive any funding to support your research for this TOPIC?
No

Were you provided with any honoraria, payment or other compensation for your work on this study?
No

Do you have any financial relationship with any entity which may closely compete with the medications, materials or instruments covered by your study?
No

Do you own or have you applied for any patents in conjunction with the instruments, medications or materials discussed in your study?
No

This work was not supported by any direct or non direct funding. It is under the author's own responsability

Objectives: Given a more and more liberal discourse about sexual relations, identities and a surge in demand for procedures that address the human genitalia, we wanted to understand which historical precedings make even us medical professionals still struggle with talking about our most private parts today.

Introduction: Starting with the first anatomical descriptions of the human genital components, we explored which geographic and societal components are influencing the way we think and speak about all sex-related issues up until today.

Materials / method: We conducted a broad research taking into account historical anatomical publications and books in evolving editions, theories of sexual development and sex educations as well as the voices of sexual psychology experts.

Results: Events, developments and findings of over 2000 years back in history still influence how we think, talk and act about the topic of human genitalia and sexual reproduction today. Being aware of these influences and biases can help us as medical service providers.

Conclusion: Understanding the complex history, we can learn to better communicate with our patients, remove taboos that hinder open discourse in this growing market and provide the highest grade of care in performing genital treatments whilst understanding the clients motivation better.

Disclosures

Did you receive any funding to support your research for this TOPIC?
No

Were you provided with any honoraria, payment or other compensation for your work on this study?
No

Do you have any financial relationship with any entity which may closely compete with the medications, materials or instruments covered by your study?
No

Do you own or have you applied for any patents in conjunction with the instruments, medications or materials discussed in your study?
No

This work was not supported by any direct or non direct funding. It is under the author's own responsability

Objectives: Our double-blind longitudinal clinical psychological research included 14 menopausal women with high FSFI satisfaction scores following laser or RF vaginal interventions.

We demonstrated a high positive correlation between the subjects’ FSFI scores and the Hy (hysteria), D (Depression) and L (Lie) scales of the MMPI-2. Such high positive correlation between the FSFI and the L-scale negates the reported increase in female sexual satisfaction following laser or RF vaginal rejuvenation.