Objectives: Non-medical practitioners performing aesthetic procedures have become a concerning issue, leading to various complications. This paper presents a case series detailing four instances of complications following plasma jet treatment administered by non-medical professionals in Uberlândia. The complications observed included keloids, ectropion, and persistent erythema among the patients. The primary objective of this report is to highlight the ethical and legal aspects surrounding aesthetic medicine and the ensuing legal implications when addressing such complications.
Introduction: Complications arising from non-medical practitioners in aesthetic procedures are increasing. This case series from Uberlândia-MG, can elucidating these cases, and we aim to raise awareness among patients regarding the risks associated with aesthetic procedures and provide guidance to medical professionals on appropriate management strategies. This study underscores the importance of patient education (period between iatrogenesis and seeking specialized care ranged from 20 days to 1 year) and the necessity for stringent regulations to ensure the safety and efficacy of aesthetic interventions.
Materials / method: Case 1 – A 44-year-old female patient, Fitzpatrick skin type IV, presented for medical consultation on the nineteenth day after undergoing laser treatment (plasma jet) at a non-medical facility. Dermatological examination: thinning of the lower eyelids, persistent erythema, bilateral eyelid retraction, two areas with thickened skin suggestive of hypertrophic scarring, mild cicatricial ectropion with separation of the eyelid margin from the globe, and inferior punctate keratopathy.
In 2023, I received three additional clinical cases of the same nature. The most severe was permanent ectropion.
Results: Case 1 was addressed from the outset, with follow-up by a multidisciplinary team, including hyperbaric therapy, ophthalmological evaluation, and plastic surgery assessment: all opted for conservative treatment. Radiofrequency device was performed to assist with healing, and the patient initiated legal proceedings against the aesthetic team. We decided to await the conclusion of legal proceedings before proceeding with Nd:YAG laser treatment for persistent erythema. Of the other 3 cases, one received treatment with a radiofrequency device, Nd:YAG laser, and botulinum toxin for keloids.
Conclusion: In conclusion, legal medicine plays a pivotal role in addressing permanent deformities resulting from aesthetic procedures. Dermatologists must cautiously navigate such cases, considering the ethical, legal, and clinical implications. Additionally, accepting cases of complications from non-medical practitioners carries legal and ethical risks. However, safe and conservative treatments are available, including laser therapy and botulinum toxin, administered by qualified medical professionals. It is imperative to prioritize patient safety and well-being while navigating these complex situations.
Divulgação de informações
Você recebeu algum patrocínio para sua pesquisa neste tema?
Não
Você recebeu algum tipo de honorário, pagamento ou outra forma de compensação por seu trabalho neste estudo?
Não
Você possui relação financeira com alguma entidade que possa competir com os medicamentos, materiais ou instrumentos abordados no seu estudo?
Não
Você detém ou pediu a registro de patente para algum dos instrumentos, medicamentos ou materiais abordados no seu estudo?
Não
Este trabalho não recebeu nenhum patrocínio direto ou indireto. O mesmo está sob a própria responsabilidade do seu autor.