Всемирный Конгресс 2019
Программа

ФОКУС НА S231

Хирургия тела

Фокус на программу

Зал: Salle Paris (level 1)
Дата: суббота 2 февраля 2019 в 16:30 до 17:30
Формат: ФОКУС-СЕССИЯ > лекции по основной теме конгресса

Председатели

Доктор Christiane ERMISCH

Пластический хирург

Франция

Доктор Michel ROUIF

Пластический хирург

Франция

Доктор Marcos Paulo SFORZA

Пластический хирург

Великобритания

Лекции сессии

Время	Спикеры	Заголовок сессии	Абстракт	Номер
16:30	Prof Maurice Y NAHABEDIAN	The ideal plane for breast augmentation: sub-glandular, sub-facial or sub-pectoral?	Посмотреть	70683
16:40	Доктор Armand AZENCOT	New advances in 3D simulation in breast augmentation (under an educational grant)		79645
16:50	Доктор Nathalie BRICOUT	Biocomptability and textures		84320
17:00	Доктор Charles VOLPEI	Texturation: what to think about?		81551
17:10	Prof Ernst Magnus NOAH	Mastopexy: solutions with and without implants	Посмотреть	81553

Перейти к предыдущей сессии

Перейти на следующую сессию

Рекомендуемые сессии

Увеличение груди

Грудной имплант

3D изображение

Подтяжка груди (мастопексия)

Липофилинг (грудь)

Prof Maurice Y NAHABEDIAN

Пластический хирург

США

Другие авторы :

The ideal plane for breast augmentation: sub-glandular, sub-facial or sub-pectoral?

Objectives: Review the techniques, advantages and disadvantages of the sub pectoral, subfascial, and sub glandular planes for breast augmentation

Introduction: Current approaches to breast augmentation are diverse and controversial. A long-standing topic of discussion is whether to place a breast implant in the subglandular, subfascial or subpectoral position. Each of these planes has advantages and disadvantages; however the plane of implant placement can affect other outcomes such as capsular contracture, animation deformity, rippling and wrinkling, as well as malposition.

Materials / method: Selection of the ideal location is often based on patient and breast characteristics but interestingly has geographic variability from a global perspective. Decision-making often depends on the size of the natural breast, degree of physical activity, and an appreciation of patient expectations.

Results: In general, the subpectoral position is recommended in patients with a thin body habitus and an upper pole pinch test < 2 cm, whereas the subglandular or subfascial plane can be considered in patients when the upper pole pinch thickness is > 2 cm. With all options, breast enhancement is readily achieved, adverse events are infrequent, and patient satisfaction is high.

Conclusion: This presentation will review many of the salient aspects of subglandular, subfascial and subpectoral breast augmentation with an emphasis on technique and outcomes.