Objectives: Aim: The aim of this presentation is to look into the thread lift techniques and assess that are two different cones competing with each other or are they actually complementing each other.
Materials / method: Methods & Material: In every patient who needed thread lift a combination of both cones and cogs were used. The cones were placed in the subcutaneous layer, while the cogs were placed just under dermis, in the upper layer of subcutaneous.
To improve the results a third loop suture capturing the platysma around the jawline was also introduce. This could be like a multi-plane thread.
Results: Results: The author, believes that the results will be much better and would last longer. He has been using this now for over 2 years now, and the results seems to be much better than his previous experiences.
Conclusion: Discussion: In last few years thread lift has gain a lot of popularity with different types in the market. The concept of using threads are that it will pull either the fat, if cones are used, and this will pull along the skin which will re-drape itself, or it will pull on the skin(in case of cogs) and the fat will be pulled along with it. In last two to three years lot of debates have been going on between the two types of threads in all forums including IMCAS. The author does not find any conflicts between the two types of threads rather finds a positive effect if done together, to get a b
利益冲突声明
您有否接受任何资金来支持研究这个主题?
否
您是否接受过关于这项研究的任何酬金或其他报酬?
否
你是否和任何与您的研究所涉及的药物,材料或工具有密切联系的实体存在财务关系?
否
你是否拥有或者您已经为您此研究中的工具,药物或材料申请任何专利?
否
这项工作没有任何直接或间接的资金支持。由作者自己承担责任。