Objectives: to compare ultrasound devices that can be used in cosmetic medicin for prevention of intravascualr filler injections, and treatment of complications
Introduction: Doppler Ultrasound (DUS) analysis of the face has become a matter of interest in cosmetic medicine, in particular for injectable fillers. In dealing with complications, it has the advantage of easily visualizing the filler and identifying the problem in relation to the patients anatomy. We expect that in a few years’ time DUS will become standard equipment in cosmetic doctors’ offices.
Materials / method: Having experience for 10 years with different devices, I identified three that are feasible for the cosmetic market, because they are relatively inexpensive and offer good quality for their price.
Results: I will assess each of these three on price, versatility and other practical aspects
Conclusion: Philips Lumify offers a good deal for the daily practice. The device is tablet/mobile phone based. Wisonic Piloter is twice as expensive, tablet based, and gives a sharp image with more functionalities. Samsung HM75A is more than three times as expensive, laptop based, not easily to transport, but a very versatile machine.
利益冲突声明
您有否接受任何资金来支持研究这个主题?
否
您是否接受过关于这项研究的任何酬金或其他报酬?
否
你是否和任何与您的研究所涉及的药物,材料或工具有密切联系的实体存在财务关系?
否
你是否拥有或者您已经为您此研究中的工具,药物或材料申请任何专利?
否
这项工作没有任何直接或间接的资金支持。由作者自己承担责任。