Objectives: The main objective of the present review was to examine the most common cell-based harvested tissue regenerative medicine treatments outcome evaluation.
Introduction: Multiple regenerative methods, appeared during the last years, are applied for elderly skin rejuvenation, wrinkles reduction, scar treatments. Nonetheless, no standardized, homogeneous assessment protocols and follow up timings have been established.
Materials / method: This review research method is based on a literature search. 586 Papers regarding macrofat, microfat, nanofat, stromal vascular fraction and Rigenera for face rejuvenation procedures have been found. Therefore, 68 papers were selected for the further quality analysis assessment.
Results: According to the literature analysis, there is an important heterogeneity among the papers regarding cell-based treatments.
In 33 papers out of 68 (48,5%) standardized photography has been reported, while in 22 papers out of 68 (32,3%) non-standardized photography has been reported.
In 8 papers out of 68 (11,8%) 3D photography has been used as an evaluation tool, while in 11 out of 68 papers (16,2%) other forms of imaging evaluation, such as TC and MRI have been used.
Validated PROMs have been proposed in 9 papers out of 68 (13,%), while in 10 out of 68 papers (14,7%) not-validated PROM
Conclusion: Ideally Validated PROM, corresponding to an objective evaluation 3D photography that allows skin analysis, standardized photography, and short (1 and 3 months), medium (1 year) and long follow up (2, 3 and 5 year) results as an ideal protocol for the best outcome assessment.
Findings in this research may be a general guideline for the cell regenerative medicine treatmetns and, therefore, may be the basis for the future evidence-based medicine.
利益冲突声明
您有否接受任何资金来支持研究这个主题?
否
您是否接受过关于这项研究的任何酬金或其他报酬?
否
你是否和任何与您的研究所涉及的药物,材料或工具有密切联系的实体存在财务关系?
否
你是否拥有或者您已经为您此研究中的工具,药物或材料申请任何专利?
否
这项工作没有任何直接或间接的资金支持。由作者自己承担责任。