Introduction. The patient consultation is a critical element , both in establishing trust between physician and patient, and for educating the patient in a short period of time regarding treatment options. In the past, many of us have relied on sharing our before and after gallery in order to show our skills and aesthetic style. However, most people want to know what we can do for them, not for somebody else.
Materials and methods. An updated 3D camera was introduced that allows a projection of the minimally invasive or surgical result to be seen on the particular patient in question. 360 degree images are taken, and placement of anatomic landmarks, measurements, and proportions are performed by the computer. This saves time for the physician and records these into the patient record as well. Animations of the process help the patient understand both the process and goals of the surgeon. The interactive process can involve the patient's input as well.
Results. Having a consultation module that totally focuses on the person present, rather than other people's results, helps to cement a relationship as well as educate the patient about what is possible. Of course, in any simulation it should be stated that no guarantees as to outcome can be made. Instead of having to extrapolate someone else's results to her or him, the patient can easily grasp the vision of the treating physician.
Analysis. This cost effective 3D system type is available from several vendors. Analysis of variables such as asymmetry, volumetric change, persistence of fillers,
and improvement over time can help with dissatisfied patients. Standardized measurements and pre-op review of treatment goals help to moderate patient expectations.
Conclusion. The addition of a 3D camera system with computer generated analysis and the ability to project patient outcomes with interactive animations adds value to both the preoperative education phase and the postoperative assessment phase.
Disclosures
Did you receive any funding to support your research for this TOPIC?
No
Were you provided with any honoraria, payment or other compensation for your work on this study?
No
Do you have any financial relationship with any entity which may closely compete with the medications, materials or instruments covered by your study?
No
Do you own or have you applied for any patents in conjunction with the instruments, medications or materials discussed in your study?
No
This work was not supported by any direct or non direct funding. It is under the author's own responsability