Objectives: The preferred choice between non-ablative technology and ablative techniques depends on the specific treatment and the individual patient's needs and goals.
Materials / method: Non-ablative technology, such as lasers and radiofrequency devices, heats the deeper layers of skin without damaging the surface. These treatments are typically less invasive and have a shorter recovery time than ablative treatments. They are often used to improve skin texture, reduce fine lines and wrinkles, and improve the overall appearance of the skin.
Ablative techniques, such as CO2 and erbium laser resurfacing, remove the top layers of skin by vaporizing them. These treatments are more invasive and have a longer recovery time, but they can provide more dramatic results for deep wrinkle
Conclusion: Ultimately, the choice between non-ablative and ablative techniques will depend on the specific condition being treated, the patient's desired outcome, and their individual skin type and characteristics. A consultation with a qualified medical professional can help determine the best option for each individual patient.
Disclosures
Did you receive any funding to support your research for this TOPIC?
No
Were you provided with any honoraria, payment or other compensation for your work on this study?
No
Do you have any financial relationship with any entity which may closely compete with the medications, materials or instruments covered by your study?
No
Do you own or have you applied for any patents in conjunction with the instruments, medications or materials discussed in your study?
No
This work was not supported by any direct or non direct funding. It is under the author's own responsability